Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Part 1: Pre-Med Post-Bac Programs vs. Special Master’s Degree Programs for Aspiring Biomedical Research Scientists Atoning for Their Academic Pasts

What a week. I wrote the bulk of this entry on March 26th. I’ve been fighting to complete it since then. I have been trying so hard to get my head together and take action. I have been trying so, so hard. It terrifies me, how slooooooowly I’ve moved and how ridiculously idiotic I’ve been OVER THE LAST YEAR AND A HALF. I'm beginning to panic. I can’t remain stuck. I just can’t remain stuck anymore.

Deep breath. I recently interviewed for a laboratory internship at a Major Research University. After I blogged about it, two of my favorite bloggers, Comrade PhysioProf and Candid Engineer, admonished me for my ostensible insensibility to my repulsive academic history.

Of course they did. That’s because I haven’t made it crystal clear to all my readers that I do NOT think I’m entitled to be taken seriously. Not at present. Yeah, right! If I didn’t know myself, and I had nothing but my current academic record to go on, I wouldn’t take myself seriously. I may be arrogant, but I am neither lazy nor delusional.
Read more. . .

I went on an interview for a laboratory internship because a very kind scientist and supporter of mine offered to introduce me to my interviewer. Beforehand, I firmly reminded myself that the internship would probably not fall into my lap. It was an enormous opportunity, and I gave it my best shot. I failed. La la la . . .

Then I contacted Dr. Isis for advice, whined a little on my blog, and included valuable suggestions from blog readers and the scientist who made the introduction in the first place in my consideration of what to do next. Certainly, I did not think that I’d been wronged: “Well, I never! Isn’t it obvious that despite my awesomely shittastical (h/t Hermitage) 3.4 undergraduate GPA as an English major and the overwhelmingly shittastical 2.4 GPA with which I quit my master’s degree program in archaeology and that I would rather stick pins through my eyelids than admit to on my blog, I exude the unmistakable vibe of a spectacular neurobiologist in the making?” Uh, no. That thought did not earnestly cross my mind; that paragraph did not escape my lips. I don’t do stand-up comedy.

I am twistedly grateful that the interview went the way that it did. Sure, the shame I felt afterwards hurt. It bothered me to the bone, feeling so pangingly ashamed of myself as self-assured medical students and professors bustled around tiny me and my quaint wool Godet-flare suiting skirt. However, I’ve been avidly reading the blogs of professors, postdocs and grad students in the medical sciences for several months. Accordingly, I would bet the prototypically staggering amount of my student loan debt that my interviewer’s mercilessly helpful dismissal was mere child’s play in the tea-room. Therefore, she did me a favor. As I’ve already told several of you, I will take an ass-kicking over a coddling any day of the week. Why would I do otherwise? I’m not in this for fake. I tried that already.

It’s not a pain in the ass to start at Square One. It is what it is. I am enthusiastically willing to start at Square One. I always was. Here is what happened:

In August of 2007, I terminated the loveless marriage that was my master’s work in archaeology and came out of the biomedical sciences closet. I moved back into my worriedly astonished parents’ house. Surely, I decided, I would need to start with community college classes. No one would take me seriously otherwise. The advanced courses had basic science prerequisites; the prerequisites had long waitlists. This was okay. I’d make it work. I’d take as many as I could.

I fell to plotting. Due to my extant bachelor’s degree, I did not and still don’t qualify for federal assistance with undergraduate classes. I would have to pay upfront for each class I took. I was broke, though. So I took a part-time and minimum-wage job that barely covered my car, auto insurance and medical expenses. A few months later, I found modestly-paid full-time work. Now I would earn enough money to take science classes at a community college—of which there are hundreds in Southern California.

However, community colleges surprised me by exclusively scheduling the biology, chemistry and physics classes that I wanted during the day. Due to the hellish commute undertaken by every working Los Angeleno, I could not enroll in even the earliest or latest of these classes—if I actually wanted to be present for them, let alone on time. I had always disliked the grimily infinite suburban sprawl of impersonal chain stores that is Los Angeles as heartily as the "Millionaire Matchmaker" attitude towards women that rules this town. This discovery transmuted my dislike into furious despair.

I responded to this by trying to convince supervisors to let me work at home as much as possible. My last real job was as an underpaid copywriter, marketing research assistant and web designer for a shady tattoo business. I don’t want to talk much about it. Literally dozens of frustrated employees had held this position before me. I’m only talking about the seven months before my arrival. The sales executives with whom I had to work were so sick of pestering their best clients with new marketing researchers forced by my boss to throw out the data of their predecessors and call people with the same questions that they refused to cooperate with me for weeks. They didn’t tell me why, either. My boss yelled at everyone. He looked at me, and my skin crawled. He asked very personal and irrelevant questions about my life at every meeting. Importantly, he also asked me to work on a project that I thought and still do think constituted a significant public health risk. Regular Unleaded cost $4.95 a gallon at the time, and there was nothing I did that I couldn’t do from this MacBook at home.

I planned to stick it out. I needed the money. I quit only when something exhaustingly bad happened the day after I was offered a permanent position. I was to officially accept at the end of that week. No way was I committing myself after this incident, though.

If I’d planned on making marketing or business my career? Maybe. Probably, in fact. I’m no slacker. I’m not lacking a capacity for innovation, either. But that was just the thing, wasn’t it? This nonsense had too little to do with my career of choice. It had nothing to do with my career of choice. So. No fucking way.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! I haven’t been regularly employed since. In the interim, among attempts at other kinds of work, I’ve applied for glasswasher positions. I figured there was nothing obstructively arrogant about me asking to be paid to conscientiously help take the most basic care of someone’s laboratory. I would jump at an unpaid internship, of course. I’d go back to night shifts in a coffee shop and take an unpaid lab internship in a heartbeat. Meanwhile, though. The job advertisements were there, and I tried for them.

At this juncture, the idea of enrolling in a full-time program specifically intended to prepare people like me for graduate school in research science rose uppermost in my mind. They had to exist. I could not be the only one in my position.

15 comments:

Candid Engineer said...

Candid Engineer admonished me for my ostensible insensibility to my repulsive academic history

Exaggerate much, darling? :)

Seriously, these are good steps in the right direction. I can't believe none of these places offer night classes. Given the state of the economy, I have to wonder if it would be easier to obtain a 2nd shift job or something of the sort, thus making it easier to attend daytime classes?

And yes, find yourself some glasswashing position if you have to, preferably in a good lab. VOLUNTEER if you have to, it will help you get your foot in the door. Try to talk to the people in the lab. I can tell you for sure that if some enthusiastic dishwasher with no lab experience hung around long enough, asked good science questions, and then asked to work with me, I would be infinitely more willing than if a faceless subpar resume landed on my desk.

JLK said...

I feel like I should pass Toaster's recent advice to me onto you.

You're such a brilliant writer - could you start writing up biomed research into accessible content for the layperson and getting it published in the print media?

Because while it may not entirely make up for your grades, it could clearly demonstrate to potential lab PIs that you not only understand the science, but can communicate it to others.

It is my understanding that many scientists' least favorite part of academia is writing up their shit. I would venture to bet that would be a highly marketable skillset for you to have.

For example, my rockstar undergrad professor, whose name is now permanently tied to mine in the publication arena, was looking specifically for an RA who knew APA format well enough to fact-check and copyedit her book manuscript. That's how I got that slot.

If you can demonstrate some really fucking good science-based writing, I'm betting that can open doors for you that would otherwise remain closed.

Toaster Sunshine said...

JLK, Juniper:

I should note that academic science writing is very different from writing science for laypeople.

Academic science writing is technical writing, like that found in manuals and memos. There are standardized words with very specific meanings used in biomed science, such as "attenuated", "sufficient", "potentiated", "necessary", and "stochastic". It's got a specific vernacular, as all of you who have ever read a PubMed biomed article have seen.

Laypeople aren't going to get that. In genetic interactions, "necessary" has a more refined meaning (X has to be Y for Z, or "BMP-4 is necessary for normal limb bud development in the mammalian zygote") than how we use it in daily life (X needs Y). I did some science writing and lots of political cartooning for my college newspaper but since then, despite being tempted to, I've yet to write and publish anything with my real name due to feeling like I don't know enough about anything to write with authority.

Juniper, I don't have a coherent reply to your post yet. I'll let it percolate a bit.

(WHY ARE THE BLOGSPOT WORD VERIFICATIONS MOCKING ME!!!??!?!?!??!!111!!?!)

biopunk said...

Argh! Another cliff-hanger post! You hook me in and leave me wanting MORE... :D

I'm totally there with you about the lack of lab sciences being scheduled at times outside the 9-5 realm. That really messed up my ability just-to-get-on-with-it and go back to college.

Eventually I did get on with it, but it was difficult.

My advice is to listen to the other posters and resist the urge to try to do it all in an attempt to make up for lost time. That mind-set usually ends in tears and more self-loathing. Highly regressive stuff. Avoid!

Looking forward to your next post...


p.s. @ Toaster: "stochastic" really needs to get into the general lexicon...

mareserinitatis said...

Perhaps I'm stating the obvious, but did you check UCLA extension? I took classes there...science and math...at night. And I had some pretty good teachers.

Best of luck. I know it's hard starting over...but it's absolutely worth it.

Hermitage said...

A cliffhanger? You nasty nasty girl! Just kidding. Where are you now? Email me (meinhermitage[at]gmail.com). I can try to go kick some folks to find you a minion position...maybe.

key word: ovari. God loves me, obviously.

ScientistMother said...

baby steps honey baby steps. thats all I can say

Ivan said...

As someone who hates writing with a passion, I do think that demonstrating some good writing abilities can only be a good thing. Apart from the obvious big names, someone who does a remarkably good job of science writing (at least in my eyes) is:

http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/

And as to the difference between technical and popular writing - unless biology is far more stuck up then physics I don't think there's that much of a jump from one to the other. You just need to make your writing more boring and precise, and know alot of terminology and generally how to speak in your subject (which you naturally learns when you start doing research). Trying to understand and write up research will also help you educate yourself on whatever subject you're interested in. Unfortunately understanding research articles is anything but easy even if you've been a grad student for a few years (at least for me heh), but it's worth trying.

To the general subject I would echo what most other people are saying - you should try to get your foot in the door, in any way that you can.

I usually have lunch with a very good friend of mine and his adviser. His adviser essentially started as something like a lab tech, but then took a bunch of physics grad classes, and ended up getting a Ph.D. in physics and he's now a damn good professor. And as something of a side effect he always has been attracted to helping oddballs who are good at physics but have bad grades or are otherwise not exactly your model student. Of course there aren't many such people but it's worth trying to find them.

Anyways, I'm looking forward to some philosophy of science when you get to it hehe.

-Coriolis

Juniper Shoemaker said...

You're all wonderful. I really appreciate the support.

No, really. I am wide awake tonight, and I feel completely worthless. Save for two (admittedly far from inconsequential) happy events, the last few days have been depressing, in terms of my feeling like a worthless fuck-up.



Candid Engineer,

Given the state of the economy, I have to wonder if it would be easier to obtain a 2nd shift job or something of the sort, thus making it easier to attend daytime classes?

This is the immediate course of action I've decided upon. The preponderance of the classes I want are offered during the day. Even when lectures are offered in the early evening, mandatory sections and labs are scheduled during the day at most schools.

Finding a 2nd shift job and asking to volunteer as a glasswasher in a lab is this week's primary project.


mareserinitatis,

UCLA Extension is a good suggestion for courses in many subjects, scheduling-wise. However, I've already considered this. Those classes cost six hundred dollars apiece. (Extension doesn't give discounts to UC alums, either.) I may try to take a course there next winter, though. I would like to get at least a basic chemistry course in first.

Thanks for your encouragement. It makes me feel less bleakly crazy. :)



JLK and Toaster,

Thanks for the compliment, JLK. Even though I don't feel particularly brilliant at anything, lately . . .

One of my friends works as an engineer for JPL. He asked me to help language-edit some papers for the IEEE Conference once. (They still ask me annually. They bribe volunteers with excellent food. It's fun.) Afterward, he suggested that I "look into" science writing.

The thing about science writing, though, is that most professional science writers are irked by the notion that one can just take up science writing. I understand. In general, scientists and mathematicians think that writing-- creative or technical-- is one of those things that "anyone" can do. I beg to differ.

For several reasons, one of which Toaster has deftly pointed out, an aspiring research scientist can't "just take up" science writing to prove her potential as a research scientist. How on Earth can I compete against professional science writers who have honed these specific skills for years? I would rather put that energy into doing well in some science classes and steadily gaining laboratory experience.

There's another issue. I resent the idea of my going into science writing. The engineer who suggested this to me is the husband of my high-school calculus teacher. They belong to the group of people who insisted that "Juniper is a brilliant writer with an artistic streak, so there's no way she can do hard science. Even if it's biology." Well. I listened to that, and I listened to that, and I listened to that. It's my fault. I used to be a prissy little coward, and I didn't have the courage not to listen. And I have six years of being an awful student in other subjects to show for it. And now everyone thinks I'm a nobody who is never going to be a scientist. (Fine. "Everyone".) And, yeah. During nights like these, I feel bitter about it. Bitter and worthless.

However, I like to write. To aid my understanding and improve my focus, one of my goals is to turn this blog into one with substantive science content on which I post at least five times a week. That isn't going to happen tomorrow. But, if I keep working, it should start coming true sooner than later.

but since then, despite being tempted to, I've yet to write and publish anything with my real name due to feeling like I don't know enough about anything to write with authority.

Toaster, you've been an industry scientist for some time now, right? (I'll have to plunder your blog archives soon.) Aren't you at the point where it's feasible for you to get authorship on a paper? You should totally do it and apply to graduate school again . . .



biopunk,

resist the urge to try to do it all in an attempt to make up for lost time. That mind-set usually ends in tears and more self-loathing.

HAHAHAHA! I'm so glad you're here. That's totally what I feel like I ought to be doing: trying to make up for everything at once. Joined with the awareness that I cannot fuck up anymore and my future grades must be perfect, it is not a very productive feeling.



Hermitage and SM-- thank you. You two are just great.


Hey Coriolis,

Ed Yong is an awesome writer.

Trying to understand and write up research will also help you educate yourself on whatever subject you're interested in. Unfortunately understanding research articles is anything but easy even if you've been a grad student for a few years (at least for me heh), but it's worth trying.

As I slog through the articles on genetics, neurobiology and pharmacology that I have, I get the feeling that you're exactly right. It's especially hard for me! I have to look up every little thing. (What did we do before Teh Intertubez?! And those tiny tots of today's undergrads have the nerve to whine because "Dr. Method and Theory didn't organize our articles into weekly folders on BlackBoard!" Seriously?! I may not have been a studious undergrad, but at least I didn't whine like that!) I like trying, though.

Thanks for stopping by! I wasn't kidding when I said I've been working on the Philosophy of Science Posts. They're coming.

JLK said...

Juniper, I did not mean to imply for a second that you should pursue science writing in lieu of science. Only that your writing might be able to open lab doors for you that might otherwise remain closed for the time being. I think it's a fantastic, highly-marketable skill to have.

DuWayne Brayton said...

I would just like to note that the main reason I am getting the opportunities I have, is because I am both a decent writer and am capable of understanding a lot of things. The reason that I was contacted by someone who would like me to work for them, was initially based on my writing abilities.

And I would just like to add, that it is fucking snowing right now.

In April.

Toaster Sunshine said...

I'm not trying to tell you to be a science writer in lieu of being a scientist, I just think that the two can and perhaps should be complementary (even in a genetic sense). From where I'm standing right now, I feel that academic and industry scientists spend entirely too much time cloistered within their ivory towers and not enough time interacting with the public. I think it is one of many reasons science education and literacy are so horrible in this country.

It should perhaps be noted that I'm an academic research tech, not an industry tech. Lends a different focus to the science I tend to get to do.

I'm trying to do research blogging every Wednesday, both to further develop my ability to read papers and to develop my ability to clearly write about science.

an aspiring research scientist can't "just take up" science writing to prove her potential as a research scientist. How on Earth can I compete against professional science writers who have honed these specific skills for years?

They can and should have competition to force them to be better. I was writing about word usage from a scientist's standpoint: we indulge in massive amounts of idiosyncratic jargon that sounds like babbling to the untrained. This is an impediment to scientists clearly communicating their work to normal people. Perhaps a scientifically-bent normal person would be better at it than the actual scientists.

And as for being pigeon-holed into an artsy writer, it happens to many of us. I was often called artistic, musical, or literary, but never scientific or technical. But I knew that I wanted to challenge of science and all of its complexity and that trying to be just an artist, musician, or writer would too quickly bore me. That was me attempting empathy. I'll figure it out one day.

@DuWayne:
I know. Who the motherfucking hell is in charge of this Michigan weather bullshit?

Juniper Shoemaker said...

Dear JLK,

No worries! I didn't think you were implying that I ought to pursue science writing in lieu of science research. I was airing an issue at the root of my hesitation to try any science writing.

Writing is a highly- marketable skill-- and rightly so. (This year, I hope you do more of it yourself, article-wise.) You have an excellent point. I definitely won't dismiss it.



DuWayne,

Why are you so adorable?

The reason that I was contacted by someone who would like me to work for them, was initially based on my writing abilities.

The reason why one of my (most awesome) professor readers has expressed interest off-blog in assisting my career is primarily because I can write. (A ray of hope!) So, yeah. Y'all are so totally right. I need to learn to be more of an exhibitionist. Writing-wise.

I am both a decent writer and am capable of understanding a lot of things.

I LOVE your writing! Ordinarily, I would also readily agree with your last assertion. As it is, before I do, you're going to have to admit to understanding the grave difference between 2,149 and, say, 36,000,000. You see, for all your cheeky denial, it could be worse. Especially given my penchant for travel and exploration and my mad, aforementioned JPL connections. ;)



What up, TS!

But I knew that I wanted to challenge of science and all of its complexity and that trying to be just an artist, musician, or writer would too quickly bore me.

This is empathetic enough-- in all sincerity! It's so reassuring to know you're not the only one. I'd suspected exactly this of myself for years, and I turned out to be right.

After I returned from this evening's jog through the balmy 70-degree Southern California night, I glanced at Weather Underground's U.S. Severe Weather Alerts page. Why, virtually all of Michigan is submerged under a Big-Ass Winter Storm tonight! I'd had no idea! LOLZ!

I lived on Grand Forks Air Force Base, North Dakota for awhile. I remember those April blizzards. The May ones, too. They were kind of fun, though . . . if I remember correctly . . . Does this pass for empathy? I'll try again if it doesn't. :)

Eppendork said...

Was going to write a comment but it got a bit long so i blogged on it instead.

E.

Josue said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.