Thursday, January 22, 2009

A Last Observation of Inauguration Day

(Dr. Isis wrote a beautiful post about her observations of Inauguration Day. By request, I am posting my response to it here.

This post is NOT consistently diplomatic. HOWEVER, please do NOT read this as an invitation to a Political Flame War. Be forewarned. I have no interest in one. I will delete all trollish comments without response. Despite the volatility of my feelings, gratitude for the prospect of a better America for EVERYONE made real dominates them.
I try, in my real life, to focus on the possibilities.

Okay. Seriously. After this, I disappear from the blogosphere, and I don't return until I complete a certain set of tasks. Why are you people so delightful to blog with? I'm like a crack addict now!)


I think many people possibly misread the enthusiasm Americans express for Obama. I voted for him and campaigned enthusiastically for him, but I never deified him, and neither did many of my fellow campaigners. The enthusiasm arose from what Obama symbolizes to us. Especially to those of us who opposed Bush's election twice and who have been dismayed by the fiscally irresponsible, anti-intellectual, xenophobic, quantity-over-quality, old-school imperialist, anti-Enlightenment, dominionist culture his administration represents to us. We're eager at the prospect of turning away from those things.
Read more. . .

I think Obama is just a good, smart guy in a messy business. I do not expect him to wave a magic wand and part the seas and "fix" America. I never did. Ultimately, I think whatever decisions we make as a country, good and bad, are our collective responsibility. Politicians do what we want them to do. This is still something of a democracy.

I remember vividly that, back in 2003, a good 80% to 90% of Americans in various polls wanted to wreak our fury over 9-11 by going to war. The Bush administration, like every other, did what pleased us at the time. I'm firmly convinced that we'd never have mired ourselves in war if people who wanted it had prioritized our long-term interests as a nation above instant gratification, and if people like me had worked harder to communicate our objections, instead of fearing to appear unpatriotic. Bush was a bad president because we let him be one. That's on us.

To me, and people like me, Obama symbolizes the prospect of unity and hard work among Americans, in an America in which science, manufacturing and diplomacy flourishes, and in which we achieve "national security" by strengthening the fort instead of abandoning it with broken windows and unsupervised bridges to go on military campaigns all over the frickin' world. However, we certainly do not think anyone can really achieve those things but ourselves.

In fact, lately, I've been more nervous than excited. I'm afraid everyone, including myself, will get lazy again, the way we did under the Bush administration, and the country will go down the tubes.

And, you know what? The race thing matters to me too. Obama represents a reason to "keep on truckin'". No matter how much I try to believe I have no need to discuss racism in the 21st century, the petty things sting me like hundreds of mosquitoes:

Yesterday night, some troll bopped on down to my blog to call me a nigger who would never amount to anything. For the record, I really loathe being called a nigger, every time it happens.

I've made the mistake on peeking at the Neo-Eugenics site, over which DuWayne recently expressed concern, that features the authors of The Bell Curve rambling on about how Negroid brains are on average three standard deviations, or whateverthefuck they said, smaller than white people's, which explains why we're stupid and can't enter professions like science, as well as how women of any color can't do math because you need man-sized brains for that. Incidentally, The Bell Curve came out when I was fourteen, and enrolled in a school where I was one of two black people there. I remember people not bothering to read it and still believing that it was "true". I remember only receiving religious reasons, voiced by my Catholic high school's principal, to condemn the book, when I was this borderline working-class kid who wanted facts.

I still regularly encounter patronizing whites (and, sometimes, full-blooded Asians) who don't mind casually entertaining the notion that my genetic material is crap-- and then accuse me of being "illogical" when I have the nerve to feel upset about it. As if one can't simultaneously manage volatile or intense emotional reactions to painful ideas and maintain an intellectual willingness to unconditionally examine the utility of ANY of them! 'Cause, you know, that would be fucking impossible! (There is a reason why I don't read Gene Expression, and particularly articles written by Razib, incidentally. But that's my thing, and I digress.)

In the 2008 election, for the first time, I refused to vote for any conservative candidates. Particularly Republicans. I am entirely socially liberal-- I am pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, pro-stem cell research, pro-meaningful separation of church and state in every respect-- but I value fiscal responsibility and struggle with the idea of taxing the rich more merely because they're rich, and I had felt that Republicans provided important dissent over government spending.

But Republicans have made it clear that they don't give a rat's ass about financial responsibility, and, moreover, they've decided that I'm a nigger who doesn't deserve to be called an American. They have made that explicitly clear, particularly at Sarah Palin rallies. And you can bet your ass I'm still pissed the fuck off about it. You can bet your ass that whenever a white person tells me they voted for McCain, I think, "Well, sure, you're white. Of course you don't have to care. You don't have to care at all. You're probably not even aware that you don't care." You can bet your ass that I think the difference between most Republican whites and people like DM and CPP is akin to the difference between the whites who sat on their hands during the bloody marches of my father's segregated teenhood and the whites who, for some crazy-ass reason, got up when they could have just chilled in their dining rooms and joined those marches. I noticed how all-fired important it became to Republicans to be The Party for American Whites.

Well, in my family, we ultimately ignore stupid racists and keep our eye on the prize, as Dr. Isis says. Dad's always reminding me that it was far worse when he was my age. And Obama can be seen as a symbol of this productive attitude. But Republicans can still suck it. We may be "niggers" to you, but he's still your President, motherfuckers!

You know, when I first came to this thread, all I wanted to say was that, yes, deification of anyone is bad, but I don't think fervent enthusiasm or admiration of President Obama always arises from deification. Which Dr. Isis already said, more or less. So, now, I've a) written you a novel and b) voiced my dislike of specific people's blogs when I want to be a science blogger and therefore generally prefer to keep my dislike to myself. And I've blogged about politics. I've been doing this lately. I have been blogging too much. I need to quit for a few days.

17 comments:

Stephanie Zvan said...

Dear lady, things like this are why we try to make the blogosphere an irresistible place. Duh. :)

mareserinitatis said...

I think the excitement over Obama is merely the prospect that the same options will result in logically more consistent choices that will ultimately make our nation stronger. Unfortunately, the reality is that the base options are still the same, and there's not a whole lot we can do about that.

So I agree...it's not deification. I think this notion is something that the right wing is putting forward as a way to make fun of us or as preparation for finger pointing down the road. "Look how the Chosen One has fallen! Look how He is a hypocrite!"

In fact, lately, I've been more nervous than excited. I'm afraid everyone, including myself, will get lazy again, the way we did under the Bush administration, and the country will go down the tubes.

Amen.

I know this is somewhat tangential, but I think Kevles book "In the Name of Eugenics" ought to be required reading in high school. I think it's fairly important to understand the ugly history of eugenics and how our nation took an active role in this. I actually took a class from Kevles shortly after the Bell Curve came out. I asked him what all the fuss was about (not having read the book), and he said the problem was how the authors were advocating making social policy decisions that were racist in nature. He even gave me some articles to read on it. It's horrible, horrible stuff. But people would rather stick their heads in the sand.

Professor in Training said...

Juniper, YOU can never blog too much :)

The fact that there are still people out there that think intellect is in some way related to race and skin color is astounding. And I still get hot under the collar when I see modern-day segregation occurring (Postdoc City was a civil rights hotbed) - this may be 2009 and the US may have just appointed it's first black president, but this shit still goes on whether anyone wants to admit it or not. Juniper, the fact that you have to endure this crap because of the color of your skin and your racial heritage makes me ashamed on behalf of my fellow humans. I don't give a flying fuck what color you are, I love your writing.

Finally, the one thing that concerns me about the outpouring of excitement for Obama is that a small faction of the black community seem keen to turn his presidency into a "We Now Control The White People" scenario. When I look at Obama, I don't see a black man, I see someone with vision, enthusiasm, confidence, intelligence and drive. Deifying him will only lead to problems when he has to make some tough, unpopular decisions.

Ok, now I'm just rambling so I'll stop typing!

Arvind said...

Awesome comment now becomes awesome post! Doesn't lose any of its awesomeness on re-reading either!!

Perky Skeptic said...

I like the way you think, My Fair Scientist!

Also, it boggles my mind that skin color is even an issue in this day and age! I love hearing the Kindergarten students at my son's school talk-- when they identify a person by color, in nearly all cases they are referring to the color of the person's shirt! :) "What's that blue guy's name?"

H. Lewis Smith said...

Black America and the N-qword:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP2U0jmZjec

Isis the Scientist said...

Juniper, you are an amazing blogger and I adore you.

Donna B. said...

I am a conservative and I disagree with many of Obama's policy goals.

That has nothing to do with his color. As my mother told me when we were moving to south in the late 60s, we have to set an example. Yep, I'm white.

The only thing that has ever bothered me about race relations is that I feel intimidated when a black person does something truly outrageously wrong and my condemnation of it is deemed racist.

Being a fiscal conservative does not mean I am racist, and I'm quite tired of the accusation.

Why is it not acceptable to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal? Where do people like me fit in? Is there some inherent conflict that I'm not aware of?

Suzanne said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Rebecca said...

I followed your link from Dr. Isis' comments and I just wanted to say I really liked this post. Keep working, keep thinking, and I know you will be an excellent biomedical researcher someday!

Juniper Shoemaker said...

Donna B.,

You did not read my post carefully. I praised fiscal conservatives. I condemned racist complicity. For John McCain and Sarah Palin to not condemn outright the cries of "nigger" heard repeatedly at Republican rallies, and to make the platform of the entire Republican party about exclusion of minority Americans comprises racist complicity. Read carefully next time. When INDIVIDUAL blacks say racist things to you, complain to THEM, not me. Like YOU, I am idiosyncratic. Or did you not catch your own slip?

Suzanne,

Please don't engage in rhetoric that you decry in others. Dr. King was about change through understanding, not about shrill denunciations. He knew first hand about violence and hate but he chose the high road and focused on peace and understanding. Sure, you're pissed off about racism, but when you focus on that you're giving it power.

Please do not come to MY blog, proclaim that my impassioned account of my feelings necessarily comprise "a focus on racism" and tell me what and how to write.

Your entire comment is extremely patronizing. Descriptions such as "shrill denunciations" are extremely patronizing. This attitude does not predispose me to engage constructively with you. If you want to vent, go to the blogs of conservative white Republicans and complain there. This is MY space, to describe MY life experiences as I see fit.

These two comments made me so angry I am shaking. I explicitly said that this was not an invitation to ignite a Political Flame War. If you persist in addressing me this way, I will simply delete your comments.

DuWayne Brayton said...

Juniper, I am quite sorry that you actually visited that fucking site. They really are a vile bunch of asshats. I was struck by how much so many of them sound a lot like Objectivists (Ayn Rand desciples) and have discovered that many of them actually are.

I was talking about the eugenics discussion with a friend over coffee last night, when someone overhearing us chimed in in defense of The Bell Curve. His main issue with my take, is that I haven't actually read it.

Now I am not one to generally knock a specific text without reading it. I have no qualms with knocking ideas that might be expressed, but generally I actually read something before criticizing it.

It occurred to me though, that like "evolutionary psychology," the big E Eugenics that I was being critical of is very strongly based on faith. And The Bell Curve is like it's bible - looking at the Eugenics site that I linked at my blog is clear on that.

I don't need to read the Christian bible to criticize it (though as an ex-fundie, I have read it several times through in several translations). Nor do I need to read the koran to criticize it. Why should I treat The Bell Curve any different? I have read synopsis of it. I have read apologetics for it and evidence based critiques of it. So why would I want to waste my time actually reading it? (Except maybe to understand the enemies of reason)

I did spend a fair amount of time at Eugenics sites and am preparing another post on Eugenics, eugenics and my specific opinion on the various forms of eugenics our society is currently engaged in.

I'll warn you in advance, that I may end up with an influx of Eugenics apologists. I hope not, but I am sending out some emails detailing some specific questions and if some of the recipients decide to google me they won't have any trouble finding me.

Ms.PhD said...

Thanks for alerting me to your post, although the way you did it is not really what linking to blog posts is about.

Having said that, I really like your writing and what you have to say. I'll be back to read more of your blog, I think. It should be interesting for you, the whole blogger persona thing. It has been (and continues to be) a unique journey for "me".

Juniper Shoemaker said...

Hi Ms. PhD,

I did NOT alert you to this blog post. I have never alerted you to any of my blog posts. I have never posted comments to your blog. I've blogrolled you, but that's it. Therefore, I do not deserve this rebuke.

I thank you for visiting.

Sincerely,

Juniper

Professor in Training said...

FYI MsPhD & Juniper: Blogger has been putting strange links on posts for no apparent reason other than the fact that the linked page has the original page on the blogroll. I have links on some of my comments that just won't go away (yes, I'm blogrolled on the linked page) and I've seen links to some of my posts on other people's blogs even though I didn't do anything to make that happen (they are in my blogroll though). I suspect that where all those links have come from on your post, MsPhD.

Juniper Shoemaker said...

LOL! PiT and Ms. PhD, it figures:

http://groups.google.com/group/blogger-help-troubleshoot/browse_thread/thread/c4acce6a4e3c3b68/7820e59c778d4dc5?lnk=gst&q=links+blogroll#7820e59c778d4dc5

Apparently there's a problem with Blogger's Rolling Blogroll widget. It generates crazy links that blog authors aren't initiating and don't know about.

At this point, I understand why BikeMonkey and CPP diss Blogger all the time. Here are the list of problems I've had for weeks:

1. When I first established MFS, Blogger would not process the "redirect traffic to www.myfairscientist.org" command, no matter how many times I checked the box. It simply gave me error messages and unchecked the box. I gave up. Then, weeks later, I noticed that the box had checked itself! Magically!

2.#1 is not a big deal. But, then, Blogger stopped allowing me to edit HTML in template using Firefox browser. To do it, I have to switch to Safari.

3. Blogger loses my comments to the point that I copy them before I hit "publish", so that I won't lose the work.

4. It took me a long time to get Blogger to allow me to add multiple blogroll widgets to my layout (so that I could categorize my blogroll). It just kept erasing the previous blogroll at first.

5. In Wordpress, the blogger can simply press a button to put entries behind the cut. In Blogger, your only option is to write different HTML codes into your Main Template and your Post Template. If you want to retroactively put entries behind the cut, you have to do this manually, by writing additional code into individual entries. Is it hard? No. It's just tedious.

6. The Blogger "behind the cut" toggle tends to erase the last few letters and punctuation marks in the sentence before the fold. It is also very, very picky about where you make the cut. Photos and blockquotes several paragraphs below the cut can STILL befuddle the toggle.

7. Blogger no longer allows me to write in hyperlinks myself. If I do, the links don't work. This annoys me because I write my blog entries in Word, copyright them and then copy and paste them into Blogger. It's tedious to have to go back and highlight everything and press the fill-in-the-hyperlink button.

I'd planned not to whine about it. But now I'm going to, because it's my birthday, and I CAN whine about it. Also because I'm sure everyone is really pissed about Blogger posting links to your blog on other people's in your name. I was so astonished by Ms. PhD's comment. I've never done anything to her blog but blogroll it and read it. I had no idea what she was talking about!

Blogger is teh suxxorz! LOL!

Again, Ms. PhD, thank you for taking the time to visit, and thank you PiT for your help. :)

Professor in Training said...

LOL! Consider it my birthday present to you :) Hope you're having a good one.